Hi,
I am trying to read the graphml output of graph-tool's graphml using
networkx.
https://github.com/networkx/networkx/issues/843
Unfortunately this does not work with any of the vector_* type property maps
which graph-tool uses. Have you encountered this issue before?
It seems the right thing to do might be to extend your graphml to hold the
vector_* attributes as detailed:
http://graphml.graphdrawing.org/primer/graphml-primer.html#EXT
Is there some reason why it was done the way it is? How do you manage
read/writing graphml data to other tools?
In the meantime, it might be possible to hack some read support for
graph-tool's xml into networkx. To this end, could you please advise how to
parse the 'key1' data (should be two floats)
<node id="n1">
<data key="key0">6</data>
<data key="key1">0x1.5c71d0cb8d943p+3, 0x1.70db7f4083655p+3</data>
</node>
thanks
-
--
View this message in context: http://main-discussion-list-for-the-graph-tool-project.982480.n3.nabble.com…
Sent from the Main discussion list for the graph-tool project mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have been working on a toolkit for network security analysis. I intended to
license it with a BSD license, but I ideally want the freedom to change the
license in future versions as I see fit.
So far all the dependencies have been BSD, MIT, or Boost license so I have
not really had any concerns. However, for performance reasons I need to
switch out of using networkx and graph-tool seems extremely attractive
(great quality, API, openmp use etc.). I originally chose Networkx over
graph-tool purely for the liberal license and not having to spend much
effort on license considerations.
The toolkit itself has (currently) 11 major components which can be
theoretically self-standing but are particularly useful together (do they
count as one, can they have seperate licenses?). Two of these components
require the use of a graph library.
I have now spent weeks reading the FSF, GPLv3, BSD, Boost etc. license pages
and guides and all sorts of stuff. Plenty of (people claiming to be) lawyers
who all disagree about what to do and where I stand (most of it involving
disagreements about derivative works). I would love to just get back to
design and development, something I'm actually good at!
The obvious solution would be just to GPL everything but given the amount of
pain the draconian and anti-liberal GPLv3 has given me, I don't want to
inflict that on anyone else in the future if possible. Additionally, there
are a number of people I would like to work with who would be unable due to
contractual contraints to risk using my project if it were GPL.
Has anybody had a similar situation and how have you resolved it? Can
anybody help? Tiago, if you could give me any advice about your intentions
behind choosing GPLv3 over e.g. LGPL and how my project relates to that (is
this something we should discuss off-line)?
Thanks in advance for any help.
--
View this message in context: http://main-discussion-list-for-the-graph-tool-project.982480.n3.nabble.com…
Sent from the Main discussion list for the graph-tool project mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
