graph-tool November 2022

graph-tool@skewed.de

1 participants
3 discussions

IMPORTANT: migration of this list to discourse
by Tiago de Paula Peixoto 08 Nov '22

08 Nov '22

Dear graph-tool users, I have decided to migrate this list to the discourse forum at: https://forum.skewed.de/c/graph-tool Discourse allows for web forums to work similarly to mailing lists, and many people nowadays consider them more friendly. All subscribed users to this list are now “staged users” of the discourse forum. This means that their identity can be claimed simply by creating an account with the same mail. Staged users do not have to create an account. They can post directly to the category by email via graph-tool(a)skewed.de. Replies will also be sent via email, which users can also reply via email — thus mimicking how a mailing list works. This is the same for all users, regardless if they are staged or not. Users can disable emails at any time if they so wish. IMPORTANT: Staged users will not receive email notifications for new topics posted by other users. If you wish this, then you need to open an account. Likewise, normal users need to “watch” the category to receive such notifications. In summary, if you do not create an account in the website you will cease to receive further notifications, until someone replies to one of your posts. (Emailing to the old mailing list has been disabled; all messages posted to graph-tool(a)skewed.de will henceforth come to discourse automatically. The mailing list archives are still available, but have been mirrored there in full.) Best, Tiago -- Tiago de Paula Peixoto <tiago(a)skewed.de>

1 0

New discourse forum for graph-tool
by Tiago de Paula Peixoto 07 Nov '22

07 Nov '22

Dear graph-tool users, There is now an official discourse forum for graph-tool available at: https://forum.skewed.de/c/graph-tool This mailing list is going to remain active — nothing will change, but many people nowadays prefer such web discussions over mailing lists. The link to both the mailing list and forum is now available in the project's webpage. Feel free to use what you prefer. Best, Tiago -- Tiago de Paula Peixoto <tiago(a)skewed.de>

1 1

Choosing number of blocks in each side of the bi-partite SBM
by Bernardo Modenesi 06 Nov '22

06 Nov '22

Hi, I am aware of a post asking for the same topic, but it was dated 2 years ago, but I wonder if there was any development on this front? In the function "model.minimize_nested_blockmodel_dl" it is possible to specify B_min=G and B_max=G in order to get exactly G blocks for the whole clustering. I wonder if it is possible to specify separately the number of blocks on each side of the bi-partite network, say G1 for one side of the network and G2 for the other side? Even maybe by running 2 different estimations? I also noticed that Tzu-Chi Yen has an alternative code for this, but I wonder how comparable it is to graph-tool in terms of efficiency? Code: https://github.com/junipertcy/bipartiteSBM Related doc: https://docs.netscied.tw/bipartiteSBM/usage/explore-consistency.html Thank you all!

2 1

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

graph-tool November 2022