-------- Original Message -------- Subject: v.target() does not work properly (fwd) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:18:51 +0100 (CET) From: Marodi Mate <marodi@gawain.elte.hu> To: graph-tool@forked.de CC: tiago@forked.de [I try again...] (neither does v.source()) if one applies the example about the number of second neighbors in the manula, the result is, of course, the one put there. Unfortunately it is not correct: only one node has 2 2nd neighbors. the problem is seemingly with n.target() in edit_function(). every time it returns a vertex, it returns a completely new one. the same is true for n.source(). Mate Marodi -- Tiago de Paula Peixoto <tiago@forked.de>
On 03/01/2007 07:45 PM, Tiago de Paula Peixoto wrote:
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: v.target() does not work properly (fwd) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:18:51 +0100 (CET) From: Marodi Mate <marodi@gawain.elte.hu> To: graph-tool@forked.de CC: tiago@forked.de
[I try again...]
(neither does v.source())
if one applies the example about the number of second neighbors in the manula, the result is, of course, the one put there. Unfortunately it is not correct: only one node has 2 2nd neighbors. the problem is seemingly with n.target() in edit_function(). every time it returns a vertex, it returns a completely new one. the same is true for n.source().
Mate Marodi
Yes, you're correct... I forgot to add the __eq__ and __hash__ member functions to the Vertex and Edge classes, so they could be compared. This is fixed in svn now, and I also updated the documentation. Thanks a lot for the bug report. I also detected the problem which prevented you from posting to the list, and I think it's fixed now. Cheers. -- Tiago de Paula Peixoto <tiago@forked.de>
participants (1)
-
Tiago de Paula Peixoto