In the thread linked (http://main-discussion-list-for-the-graph-tool-project.982480.n3.nabble.com/...) is written (Remember to replace mcmc_sweep() with multiflip_mcmc_sweep() in the code above. I had forgotten to make this change the last release...) Does this mean that one should also set "multiflip=True" in mcmc_equilbrate? d
On 11 Feb 2020, at 21:30, Deklan Webster <deklanw@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, I got it setup. The memory usage is now about 2~GB!
I was testing with a smaller graph and I noticed the sweeps are much slower with multiflip. Is this a fundamental tradeoff between speed and memory usage, or is there some setting to make it faster?
Thanks
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 6:11 AM Felix Victor Münch <felix.v.muench@gmail.com> wrote: This thread might answer your question:
http://main-discussion-list-for-the-graph-tool-project.982480.n3.nabble.com/...
Cheers,
Dr. Felix Victor Münch Postdoc Researcher Leibniz Institut for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI), Hamburg https://leibniz-hbi.de/ https://felixvictor.net
On Monday, Feb 10, 2020 at 5:30 PM, Deklan Webster <deklanw@gmail.com> wrote: I was trying to do a nested degree-corrected SBM on my laptop, but I was running out of RAM, 14-15GB before stopping with "Killed". The graph is directed with 20k nodes 2.8m edges.
Is that a typical amount of memory usage or did I do something wrong? If it's normal, is there any way for me to work around this such that I can run it on my computer _______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list graph-tool@skewed.de https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
_______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list graph-tool@skewed.de https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool _______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list graph-tool@skewed.de https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool