Am 17.07.20 um 19:44 schrieb Tiago de Paula Peixoto:
Am 17.07.20 um 14:19 schrieb Dominik Schlechtweg:
is there a way to suppress the likelihood of the edge probabilities as in [2] where the alpha-parameter can be used to fit "only to the weight information"? (Compare to formula (4) in [2].) [...] [2] C. Aicher, A. Z. Jacobs, and A. Clauset. 2014. Learning latent block structure in weighted networks. Journal of Complex Networks, 3(2):221–248.
How does the graph-tools implementation relate to the alpha-parameter in formula (4)? Is it equivalent to giving equal weight to edge probabilities and weights (alpha = 0.5)?
This parameter is not implemented in graph-tool.
Note that such a parameter does not have an obvious interpretation from a generative modelling point of view, specially in a Bayesian way. We cannot just introduce ad-hoc parameters to cancel certain parts of the likelihood, without paying proper attention to issues of normalization, etc, and expect things to behave consistently.
In other words, I do not fully agree with the alpha parameter of Aicher et al.
Thanks for clarifying this. Last question: Does your doubt also concern the special case where alpha = 0, i.e., ignoring edge probabilities completely? (This is the actually interesting case for us. We are not interested in tuning this parameter in any way.)
Is it possible to use LatentMultigraphBlockState() with a weighted graph?
Not yet.
We will open a feature request then, in case there is none yet.
Best, Tiago
_______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list graph-tool@skewed.de https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool