Re: [graph-tool] Which state should I copy when doing merge-split on model with weight transformation

Am 21.03.21 um 15:33 schrieb jstonge:

There is a big difference between the description length of the two models. My understanding is that the *state* in the first example comes from the previous `real-exponential` model, which means we copy its state then pass the hierarchy levels of the state_ln model. Is it supposed to be so? Shouldn't we always copy the state of the models we ran in the first place to run merge-split algorithm?

Yes, this is an error in the howto! Thanks for noticing. It will be fixed in the next version. Best, Tiago -- Tiago de Paula Peixoto <tiago@skewed.de>