21 Feb
2017
21 Feb
'17
11:07 a.m.
On 21.02.2017 10:54, P-M wrote:
Thank you for that clarification. I presume that I should not be using it to calculate the likelihood of missing edges then?
Not if you want the probabilities to be correct; though they might still be approximately correct.
From what I gather implementing parallel MCDM is not straightforward (though my knowledge of this is hazy). Is it on your list of future developments at all? Or will this section of graph-tool stay large non-parallel for now?
I don't think it is trivial to write a fully parallel code, since the model likelihood depends on the global state. So, threads that read it and modify it need to synchronize. -- Tiago de Paula Peixoto <tiago@skewed.de>